|
One of the best examples of a prophetic knowledge of the
future being contained within Codes is the Lockerbie air disaster. On 2nd
December 1988, a train of events caused me to be offered a car by a local
garage. The chassis number of the car was a string of numbers and letters,
every one of which was to prove significant in the disaster which was to
occur less than forty miles away, nineteen days hence.
The sequence gave which aircraft would crash, where – a
map reference, which airline, what time and, most important of all perhaps,
why.
The sequence of events which led to my being offered the
car and the timing of this, coming less than three weeks before the
disaster, provide strong evidence of active orchestrative, intelligent
design. In other words, meaningful coincidence is evidence of a Designer,
evidence of God, the Sentinel of Eternity.
| On 2nd December 1988, a local Scottish Borders garage manager rang me to
offer me a car. I had casually enquired about a model of this particular type of car some
weeks earlier. |
 |
We drove over to look at the car and Jenny's attention was drawn to the number 557
chalked on the top of the engine. This was a reference to the car chassis number. We took
the car for a test drive and another strange coincidence occurred involving the number 557
on another car at a place we stopped. It was as though the number was somehow being
emphasised, almost brought to our attention.
On 21st December 1988, Pan Am 103 crashed forty miles away at Lockerbie.
That
night, when we read of the crash on TV teletext, Jenny looked up Lockerbie
in an atlas. the map reference coordinates for Lockerbie were
55o7'N,
3o21'W !!!! So was that the
reason why 557 had been drawn to our attention three times in less than
three weeks, the last occasion only an hour before the crash? Did
something know very precisely what was about to happen?
The chassis number of the car was
7AM396557 |
 |
The next day we watched the local Borders ITV channel to try to
discover the identity of the plane that crashed. We managed to read the name on the
cockpit. It was Clipper Maid of the Seas. One of my aircraft reference
books gave me its registration number - N739PA.
To our amazement, we realised this aircraft registration number was
makes up the first three numbers of the chassis number of the car we had taken for
the test drive. 7AM396557
What is more, the two letters which occur between the fist and second
numbers of the chassis number
7AM396557
are the second word of the name of the airline - Pan
Am. How
strange, we thought. The chassis number was like a code identifying which plane would
crash and where.
Only one number in the sequence was unused. It was not
until the following July that we understood the meaning of the apparently unused 6'.
It was actually an important part of the code also, part of the why.
I came across a newspaper article referring to the first anniversary of
the loss of an Iran Air A320 Airbus in the Persian Gulf. Suddenly
I understood the 'why' of the destruction of Pan Am 103. It was the
shooting down of Iran Air Flight 655,
on 3rd July 1988. This was the meaning of the unused '6'.It
was paired with the following 55
to give 655 |
 |
The cross-correspondences are uncanny - some people call it
spooky. The first two numbers of the chassis code
7AM396557give
the time also. 7.3AM or 7.3PM was how railway timetables showed times before
British Railways lost its soul and became British Rail. It was then it
adopted the 24 hour clock. Pan Am 103 was destroyed at 7.03 pm on 21st
December 1988. Iran Air 655 was destroyed on the 7.03.88 using the standard American dating system.
Both aircraft even
had almost identical liveries, white with a sky blue cheat line. The only real
difference was the Iran Air bird on the tailfin rather than the stylised Pan Am globe and
its associated American flag.
Was this code sequence
coincidence all just chance? Why should that car, of the precise make, model
and engine size I had specified, have arrived at a local garage less than three weeks before
the Lockerbie disaster? And why did the idea come to me to ask about a new
car which we could not possibly afford to buy?
Did something know the future? I had got
the idea to ask about a car of this particular make and model early in November. Why did I
even bother to enquire because we had no money to buy a new car? The idea just came
into my head one day as I was paying for petrol at that particular garage when we were on
our way to Edinburgh. Was something setting in motion a train of events which were to link
to another momentous event 40 miles away and five or six weeks into the future which it
knew would happen? Was something warning that it knew the real truth?.
Of course you could always fall back on the skeptics 'explanation' for
everything. It is all chance. Their great problem is that their religious belief system,
scientism, precludes any other explanation. No mathematical theories can address something
which lies beyond what we call space and time. They cannot be applied to some
greater reality beyond. This is one reason for the vitriolic attacks by skeptics on
any evidence adduced from either personal religious experience or psychical research. By
their nature such experiences are not repeatable. They can therefore be dismissed as at
best anecdotal, at worst fraudulent . In either case they are not worthy of further
attention. But the limitations of conventional science are precisely that. Its limitations
should not prevent man using his mind and his logic in seeking to learn what lies beyond
the reach of conventional science. The skeptics say there is nothing. Their lives
are all the poorer for that. Why do they exhibit such messianic zeal in trying to
convince others that there is nothing but the sad world of materialism in which
most people
attempt to live today.
In July 1992, Newsweek published a long article to mark the anniversary
of the shooting down of Iran Air 655 by the Vincennes. The cover story was entitled
Sea
of Lies, a reference to the dishonesty shown by both the Pentagon and the
White House after the catastrophic act of incompetence by the crew of the Vincennes.
I found this magazine at the bookstall at the Stars and Stripes Bookstore on a USAF base
near Bedford in England. In fact it was when I was working at RAF Chicksands. US
AFB Chicksands as it would more honestly have been called, was a spy station
set up by the Americans in Britain shortly after the war to warn of any
possible threat to America. And it was there one day that my coincidence
codes gave me 'Lockerbie comes to America'. The date was 11th September 1992
ie 9-11-92, exactly nine years before it did. The crater of Sherwood
crescent was replicated in the heart of Manhattan on 9-11-01.
As for 'Sea of Lies', to use a related metaphor, the investigation into the loss of Pan Am 103
would be best described as an 'Ocean of Lies'. So many things have
happened over the years, so many strange coincidences, that indicate to us
that despite whatever so-called evidence was produced at the Scottish inquest
and the Netherlands trial, there was no bomb. The two accused Libyans were
completely innocent. Their crime was to be Libyans. But the British and American
governments have been determined that their version of the truth shall
prevail. Now the one convicted will rot in a Scottish prison for a crime he did not
commit.
N739PA was a geriatric plane that had been modified by the Pentagon for
use in the Strategic Reserve. It merely suffered from massive structural failure. The
blame for the disaster, can be placed entirely on American shoulders - the Pentagon and
Pan Am. But, there is a natural justice in the fall of Pan Am 103 - hence the references
in the chassis number Code of Destiny?
It fell because of American incompetence - as did Iran Air 655.
Further details can be found in
a booklet entitled The
Pointers', and a full account will be published in
a book entitled 'The Jupiter Theme'
|